120 years later, Is AC Milan’s journey back to the top a wild goose chase or a possibility?

Robinho and Zlatan Ibrahimovic of AC Milan celebrate scoring the second goal during the UEFA Champions League round of 16 first leg match between AC Milan and Arsenal FC at Stadio Giuseppe Meazza on February 15, 2012 in Milan, Italy.

(Feb. 14, 2012 - Source: Claudio Villa/Getty Images Europe)

Good old days

They were the best team in Europe! Undisputed champions of the world! A solid whale making waves in the sea! The club won unforgettable 18 Series A championships, 7 Champions Leagues, and it’s impossible to forget the renowned players who played for the club including Ronaldinho, Kaka, Gattuso, and Maldini.

During the glorious days of the club, most players in the first eleven would qualify into the dream team of the world. Yet, the Italian giants find themselves at rock bottom with hardly any recognition in the world. Is AC Milan still recognised in the top 20 clubs in the world? Absolutely Not! The story of AC Milan can only be described as, “Riches to Rags.” The inevitable question then comes: “What really happened to AC Milan?”

AC Milan is a European club that plays in the Italian Serie A and was definitely one the most successful clubs in the world for many years particularly in the 80s, 90s and early 2000s. The club was a powerhouse before Juventus started dominating the Serie A as it has been in the past few years. The club was founded in 1899 by a group of English expatriates. At the commencement of the year 1980 going forward, AC Milan was the best club in Serie A, if not the best club in Europe. It had renowned world-class players such as Marco Van Basten, and Frank Rykuk to mention but a few and the club won 3 Championships in this period leaving a mark that cannot be erased.

The start of the millennium was just as fruitful, as they managed to win two more UEFA Champions League titles in 2003 and 2007. Their team had big guns such as Andre Shevchenko, Clarence Seedorf, Paulo Maldini, and Kaka. It was undoubtedly a team of legends! Unfortunately, that team was the last one to make such a tremendous impact to date.

How did they get here?

AC Milan has not been in the UEFA Champions League competition in the last 5 years. They have been number 6 on log standings in the Serie A for the last 2 years and 10th in 2016, which is totally embarrassing for a club of such caliber. The transition of letting veteran players go from the club and roping in new players was badly managed, as well as the club's management. The club has had 8 managers and 3 owners in the last 5 years, which is unheard for a club of such heritage, paramount value and popularity.

Franck Kessie of AC Milan gestures during the Serie A match between AC Milan and Chievo Verona at Stadio Giuseppe Meazza on October 7, 2018 in Milan, Italy.

(Oct. 6, 2018 - Source: Marco Luzzani/Getty Images Europe)

Whilst the club was still at its peak in 2011, Silvio Berlusconi completely transformed the whole system and changed the philosophy that made the club great. He no longer depended on former players with relevant club-play experience and stopped buying expensive players. Worse off, he prioritized selling his top players at that time and some of them being Thiago Silva and Zlatan Ibrahimovic who were sold to PSG in 2012 and one shocking moment being letting Andreas Pirlo go to Juventus for free. One of the main strategies of the executive team was to depend on young players who were coming from the academy, just the way Barcelona does with La Masa Academy. Only that in this case, it was a real bummer.

The club was making these terrible decisions, simultaneously making improper decisions when purchasing new players, for instance purchasing Robinho for €20 million, and Andrea Betalachi for $23 million. In the aftermath of poor seasons, the club yanked old stars for free such as Fernando Torres to boost the squad, but unfortunately, there was no light at the end of the tunnel. Slowly but surely the club’s level of competence slid through anonymity and the club was sold to a Chinese businessman hoping the club will rise to the occasion and regain lost glory.

Silvio Berlusconi bought AC Milan when the club was down on its very knees in the late 80s and he built it until it had become a force to reckon with in European football. Following the arrival of Berlusconi, the club grew immensely right and it reached tremendous heights. Regardless of success on the pitch, Berlusconi was also involved in politics and became Italy’s prime minister but was however mired in corruption allegations. He was eventually found guilty of tax evasion and barred from the public office. Having initially struggled financially he eventually found a key buyer from China for AC Milan as a way of offloading pressure from his life that was already in jeopardy.

“Whilst the club was still at its peak in 2011, Silvio Berlusconi completely transformed the whole system and changed the philosophy that made the club great. He no longer depended on former players with relevant club-play experience and stopped buying expensive players”

— Farai Maringa, FirstTouch Africa

The businessman from China

A wealthy businessman named Li Yonghong paid a nine-figure deposit to begin negotiations in purchasing AC Milan. New York Times reported that the Chinese man was not as wealthy as he proclaimed to be and his business was not as lucrative as elucidated. Regardless of the red flags and multiple issues raised with regard to Li Yonghong’s credibility, the sale went through successfully in March 2017. Silvio Berlusconi decided to let go of the club in the aftermath of poor pitch and financial performances.

With the intense drive to take the club on an upswing just after acquiring the club, Li Yonghong decided to go on a spending spree when he purchased Bonucci and Andre Silva. The new signings did not make a significant change to the club’s results despite the named fellows making impact currently. Henceforth, the club remained in shambles. The Chinese investors upon realising little or no return for their massive investment over the years in the club, they backed out and closed their billfolds.

Paolo Maldini, Kaka and other players of AC Milan celebrate after winning the FIFA Club World Cup final against Boca Juniors and AC Milan at the International Stadium Yokohama on December 16, 2007 in Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.

(Dec. 16, 2007 - Source: Junko Kimura/Getty Images Sport)

Li Yonghong received a loan from Elliot Management equating to $354 million. All these issues were inadvertently affecting the players and coaches as the club that season went on to lose to Juventus, Napoli, Roma, and Inter Milan. After the horrendous losses, it was inevitable that coach Vincenzo Montella was unceremoniously sacked and the club hired a Milan luminary named Gennaro Gattuso.

AC Milan’s management continued to disappoint the club and its supporters when UEFA turned down AC Milan’s voluntary agreement to be in accordance with Financial Fair Play(FFP) Rules. The main news channel read that, “there are still uncertainties to the refinancing of the loans attached to the club to be paid back in October 2018 and the financial guarantees provided by the main shareholder.” Adding fuel to the fire, allegations were raised that Li Yonhong and some of his businesses were bankrupt, leaving an uncertain future for the club’s financial status.

The club was sold again and it’s now owned by Elliot Fund, American owners. The new owner engaged old guys like Maldini and they had a successful transfer of players when they bought Pacqueta for their midfield, and the phenomenal Piatek who is a goal-scoring machine, and evidence was getting 10 goals in 13 games. This gave absolute hope to the whole club and fans for a glorious future who were feeling absolutely discouraged for a number of years.

Celebrating 120 years and the rebuilding continues

Perhaps AC Milan has a lot to learn from Inter Milan with regards to rebuilding a club that was once famous? Perhaps AC Milan, who are now 120 years-old as of December 2019, can become one of the greatest football clubs once again to ever play in Europe?

All these questions can only be answered when the proper financials and proper managers are put in place for AC Milan. Jürgen Klopp transformed Liverpool from the miry clay and drove it onto a rock to stay, and he is the “type” of passionate coach needed to transform AC Milan club. A lot of effort, sheer commitment and determination are indispensable to make AC Milan great again. Truth be told, the team is currently far away from its peak, but there is great hope for an emphatic return to the UEFA Champions League in 10 years to come.

To what extent are local football associations determining results by successive pay-dispute rows?

Introduction

Local football associations are the seedbeds for continental talent. Before we meet players at large tournaments like the Africa Cup of Nations and FIFA World Cup, the conditions that they are subjected to while within their localities actually determine their overall performance. Over the years, several teams have had pay disputes with their national associations. They have refused to board planes and have even threatened to boycott some matches without getting their pay. This article wants to dig deeper into this problem by analysing some of the underlying issues and what the implications of pay disputes are on African football. Before that, we will take a quick look at some countries that have fallen victim to this problem.

“By the time a whole team has agreed to boycott a game, it means the individual frustration that comes with being unpaid has mounted to a team level. Imagine how a group of frustrated players are supposed to train together, take each other’s mistakes and say their chants with high voices and joy. It is almost impossible.”

— Simiso Shabangu, FirstTouch Africa

Cameroon supporters cheer for their team ahead of the 2017 Africa Cup of Nations group A football match between Cameroon and Guinea-Bissau at the Stade de l'Amitie Sino-Gabonaise in Libreville on January 18, 2017. / AFP / GABRIEL BOUYS

(Jan. 17, 2017 - Source: AFP)

 Cameroon

Cameroon came 24 hours after the deadline because the Cameroonian Football Federation had delayed to pay their salaries and bonuses. This is in spite of the fact that the tournament regulation stipulates that teams should arrive at the host country at least 5 days before their opening game. In light of that, Cameroon might have to pay a fine for that. Is that irresponsibility? Definitely, not. The team refused to board a plane to Egypt because they demanded their salaries to be doubled for playing in the tournament. This was one of the players’ last technic. They had agreed to only 25% on their salaries and bonuses and even paid for their plane tickets to training camps which were held in Madrid and Doha. Such sacrifices are a testament of how much the players are willing to do for their country if only that would be complemented by efforts from the government.

Nigeria

Nigeria almost missed their 2013 FIFA Confederation Cup campaign after they also refused to fly out of Nigeria without their bonuses being paid. The most daring one and my personal favourite was that of the Super Falcons who decided to stay in their hotels in France and not fly out unless their bonuses are paid. In 2016, they also protested after they won the African Women’s Cup of Nations. It is very hard to understand how a team that has demonstrated consistent excellence is not paid on time. There are countries that would kill to have teams that play like the Nigerian Women’s national team.

Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe national team did go on the plane but refused to go for training while they were in Egypt as a way to express their grievances against the Zimbabwe Football Federation. They too had not been paid for some time. They also threatened to miss their first game if their accounts were not credited on time. Despite having a talented squad that looked quite promising, the Warriors were eventually eliminated from the group stages.

Where is the problem?

Guinea-Bissau's forward Piqueti advances with the ball past Cameroon's defender Collins Fai before scoring a goal during the 2017 Africa Cup of Nations group A football match between Cameroon and Guinea-Bissau at the Stade de l'Amitie Sino-Gabonaise in Libreville on January 18, 2017. / AFP / GABRIEL BOUYS

(Jan. 17, 2017 - Source: AFP)

For countries like Nigeria whose players have continuously done this to prove that this is not a one-time off problem but a challenge that is deeply engraved in the system, problems such as corruption and mismanagement of funds have been cited as some of the major causes for these pay disputes. Even when the money leaves the government coffers intended for the soccer players, for some reason it finds itself in the pockets of government officials who have perhaps not kicked a ball in decades. Corruption is such a rampant problem that has stifled many sectors of African governments. The bigger problem is that some African countries do not generally prioritise sports so much they are not given adequate funding. Private companies come in to sponsor local soccer leagues with the hope that the government will come in to take care of the national team. For example, in South Africa there is the ABSA Premiership and the MTN Super 8 which are sponsored by private companies. Instead, the government will give excuses about more pressing problems that need to be taken care of in the country. What makes things even worse is that some federations would not proactively communicate their challenges ahead of time. Sometimes, well-communicated disappointment is better than unkept promises. Some governments will go all the way to signing contracts with players only to go silent on them when it is time to pay. For example, Cameroon had a presidential decree in 2014 that stipulated that all salaries and bonuses will be paid at the commencement of any tournament. Was it ever upheld though? We told that story already.

Asisat Oshoala of Nigeria reacts after missing a breakaway attempt during the FIFA Women's U-20 Final against Germany at Olympic Stadium on August 24, 2014 in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Photo by Richard Wolowicz/Getty Images)

(Aug. 23, 2014 - Source: Richard Wolowicz/Getty Images North America)

Setting a precedent

Under no circumstances is it ever justifiable for anybody to work with no compensation, but why is it important for governments to set the right precedent for national teams? Firstly, the amount of effort it takes to get into the national team just deserves the rightful amount of compensation. Most of the players that make it to the national teams are their local teams’ star players and some have become so good that they have been outsourced by teams outside of their countries. The saturation of unquestionable talent in most national teams across Africa should prompt governments to do the right thing.

 Sports has become the escape route from social ills for most African youths. In a continent with high unemployment rates and pressure to engage in crime and corruption, sports is the unifying factor for young people that helps them evade these things. Beyond the fitness benefits that soccer comes with, it is also a sport that requires dedication, discipline and focus. Playing at the highest level of this taxing soccer journey should be rewarded profusely so that other young people can be motivated to continue working hard. If you cannot give African youth jobs, then at least give them the motivation to work hard on something.

Impact on performances

We have already established that the ability to win a game is not just determined by the talent and skills displayed on the field. It is also determined by the players’ emotional and mental wellbeing. Compensation gives one the motivation and aspiration to do more. In the absence of that, the opposite can also be true. It is not a shock that Cameroon went into AFCON 2019 as champions but barely made it far in the tournament. They were eliminated by Nigeria at the round-of-16 stage.

Team Germany poses for a photo with the championship trophy and their gold medals during the FIFA Women's U-20 Final at Olympic Stadium on August 24, 2014 in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Germany defeated Nigeria 1-0 in overtime.

(Aug. 23, 2014 - Source: Richard Wolowicz/Getty Images North America)

 It also destroys team morale. By the time a whole team has agreed to boycott a game, it means the individual frustration that comes with being unpaid has mounted to a team level. Imagine how a group of frustrated players are supposed to train together, take each other’s mistakes and say their chants with high voices and joy. It is almost impossible. There is only so much that a good coach can do for them when they are not intrinsically motivated.

 Conclusion

Before we blame players for not being focused or not training hard enough, it is important that we look at issues such as pay disputes that affect how much they can bring to the field. It has also transpired that the problem is with internal systems that do not prioritise or facilitate the timely payment for the players. Sadly, national teams which are meant to be countries’ pride are then not able to perform to their best levels due to factors that could be avoided. The lack of transparency also does not make it any better.

 With all that said, do you think teams are actually justified in boycotting matches and tournaments in order to get the attention of their governments?